About Me

Name: Ken Maes
Location: San Antonio, TX
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

Racism Is Alive and Well in America

In the past few months a lot has been said and written about racism in America. Especially in view of the fact that we have our first candidate on a major ticket who is African American. It is sad that we live in a country that is so great yet there seems to be a great divide among our people. Yet in my humble opinion those who are playing the race card are those who are yelling "racism" the loudest and the very ones who are making this presidential election about race.

I read the following poem by the widely known poet Nikki Giovanni, Professor of English and Black Studies at Virginia Tech. Here is one of the poems she has written:


"Ni**er
Can you kill
Can you kill
Can a ni**er kill
Can a ni**er kill a honkie
Can a ni**er the Man
Can you kill a ni**er
Huh? Ni**er can you kill
Do you know how to draw blood
Can you poison
Can you stab a Jew
Can you kill huh? Ni**er
Can you kill
Can you run a protestant down with your
'68 El Dorado
(that's all they good for anyway)
Can you kill
Can you p*ss on a blond head
Can you cut it off
Can you kill
A ni**er can die
We ain't got to prove we can die
We got to prove we can kill...."
++++++++
Excerpt from her bio: ".......Giovanni remains as determined and committed as ever to the fight for civil rights and equality."
This is a lady who has received numerous awards along with 21 honorary degrees!
 
Yes, racism is alive and well and we can thank educators like Giovanni for keeping it alive and well!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ROBIN HOOD IN REVERSE

We all know the story of Robin Hood, the bandit who took from the rich to give to the poor. Well meet Robin Hood of Wallstreet who takes from the poor and gives to the rich. This is exactly what this bailout has done!

Check out the following salaries from 2003 - 2007:

  • Richard Fuld, Lehman Brothers $256,411,839
  • Kenneth Lewis, Bank of America $133,360,889
  • James Dimon, JP Morgan Chase $108,724,585
  • Lloyd Blankfein , Goldman Sachs $102,744,979
  • Phillip Purcell, Morgan Stanley $ 95,189,490
  • James Cayne, Bear Stearns $ 82,537,003
  • E. Stantley O'Neill, Merrill Lynch $ 80,969,684
  • William Harrison, JP Morgan Chase $ 71,203,439
  • Charles Prince III, Citigroup $ 65,455,138
  • John J. Mark, Morgan Stanley $ 41,157,683
  • John A. Train, Merrill Lynch $ 15,062,141
  • V. Kram Pandit, Citigroup $ 250,000

It seems as the last person made very little compared to the others but WAIT, the $250,000 was the amount this fat cat made for one month of work!

Now I am all for the free enterprise system and I would never knock anyone who made the amounts listed above. Yet what upsets me the most is that these people made all this money and it seems none of them were worth it as we are now being asked to bail them out for the mis-managment of their companies. And who is helping them in taking from the poor to give to the rich? None other than Henry Paulson, Secretary of the Treasury who was in charge of Goldman Sachs. As it is said, "birds of a feather flock together".

Once again we the people get the royal end of the stick!

 

source: NY Times Business Section, check it out for more details.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/10/07/business/20080929-payout-graphic.html?hp

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

VOTER FRAUD - FACT OR FICTION?

 I recently attended a Jazz Fest that is held in San Antonio every year. The weather was awesome so I took my Great Dane Buddy and decided to relax and enjoy all the fine jazz bands that come from all over to perform.

This time was a little unusual as I noticed that several of the people that were there were people that had been displaced by hurricane Ike. They were staying at one of the shelters the city had set aside which apparently was near by. Many had gravitated towards me as they were taken in by my Great Dane. As they gathered to pet my pup I engaged in some small talk with them and come to find out that all of them were from the Galveston area.

I also learned that they had lost all that they had and my heart was aching for them as I never have known what it is to lose all that you own. Come to find out that these people were homeless when they lived in Galveston and were talking among themselves how they could con FEMA into giving them money and were bragging that some of their friends already had received checks from the government.

About this time there were about six men and women wearing Tee-Shirts with the ACORN name across it and were walking and talking to people in attendance. They then noticed the
homeless people and talked to them about registering to vote. I overheard the conversation between the ACORN representatives and the homeless evacuees. The homeless were telling the ACORN representatives that they did not have an actual mailing address and some did not even have a good source of identification. Then I heard one of the ACORN people tell them not to worry, that they just needed their names and that they, the ACORN people would provide the rest of the information. Some of the homeless went ahead and registered and others just walked away.

Well, I kind of put this out of my head until I came across the following video on You Tube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXdt20k5WtE&NR=1. Now as I read about the concerns over voter fraud I thought back to this incident at the jazz fest and just shake my head in disgust.

Will this election be stolen,via voter fraud? After all these are the very tactics put fourth by Saul Alinsky in his books and these are the very lessons being applied by the Obama team. I wish I would have snapped at that moment and notified someone but I didn't. However I turned an opportunity which I thought I had lost to correct a wrong into one where I could have a positive influence on this election. I have volunteered to work the polling areas as one who will be checking for voter fraud. I want to help in taking back America and I encourage everyone to get involved. We can make a difference!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

545 People by Charlie Reese

 love it when I receive articles that are full of passion such as the one I am going to post. This was sent to me by my brother via his son-in-law and I want to share it with all my subscribers.
So here it is:

545 People
by
Charlie Reese
 
Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them. Have you ever wondered why, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits? Have you ever wondered why, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes? You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does. You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does. You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does. You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does. You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does. One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices , 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country. I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank. I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes. Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party. What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it. The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? She is the leader of the majority party. She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to. It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can not replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.
If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair. If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red. If the Army & Marines are in IRAQ, it's because they want them in IRAQ. If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.
There are no insoluble government problems. Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like 'the economy,' 'inflation,' or 'politics' that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do. Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible. They, and they alone, have the power. They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees. We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!
++++++++++++++++++
Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.

What you do with this article now that you have read it is up to you, though you appear to have several choices.
1. You can send this to everyone in your address book, and hope they do something about it.
2. You can agree to vote against everyone that is currently in office, knowing that the process will take several years.
3. You can decide to run for office yourself and agree to do the job properly.
4. Lastly, you can sit back and do nothing, or re-elect the current bunch.

YOU DECIDE, BUT AT LEAST SEND IT TO EVERYONE IN YOUR ADDRESS BOOK, MAYBE SOMEONE IN THERE WILL DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!

Remember if each person sends to a minimum of 10 people, and each one repeats this action, this e-mail will be received by millions very quickly. That's the power the INTERNET has. But everyone who receives this MUST SEND TO 10 MINIMUM (or more) in their address book!
Harlan and Karen Moore
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Enemy From Within

 I recently received the following email from my brother that he had received from a friend of his. It is very interesting to read, not to mention how incredible the power of research is and how available it is to everyone. The sad part is that not everyone takes the time to do research instead they rely on a biased main stream media for their only source of information. Having stated that I share with you, a very interesting email from someone who decided to find out for themselves about Barrack Obama.

To All My Friends,

" This is long, but very important, please take the time to read it.This election has me very worried. So many things to consider. About a year ago I would have voted for Obama. I have changed my mind three times since then. I watch all the news channels, jumping from one to another. I must say this drives my husband crazy. But, I feel if you view MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News, you might get some middle ground to work with. About six months ago, I started thinking "where did the money come from for Obama". I have four daughters who went to College, and we were middle class, and money was tight. We (including my girls) worked hard and there were lots of student loans.I started looking into Obama's life. Around 1979 Obama started college at Occidental in California. He is very open about his two years at Occidental, he tried all kinds of drugs and was wasting his time but, even though he had a brilliant mind, did not apply himself to his studies. "Barry" (that was the name he used all his life) during this time had two roommates, Muhammad Hasan Chandoo and Wahid Hamid, both from Pakistan. During the summer of 1981, after his second year in college, he made a "round the world" trip. Stopping to see his mother in Indonesia, next Hyderabad in India, three weeks in Karachi, Pakistan where he stayed with his roommate's family, then off to Africa to visit his father's family. My question - Where did he get the money for this trip? ! Neither I, nor any one of my children would have had money for a trip like this when they were in college. When he came back he started school at Columbia University in New York. It is at this time he wants everyone to call him Barack - not Barry. Do you know what the tuition is at Columbia? It's not cheap! to say the least. Where did he get money for tuition? Student Loans? Maybe. After Columbia, he went to Chicago to work as a Community Organizer for $12,000. a year. Why Chicago? Why not New York? He was already living in New York. By "chance" he met Antoin "Tony" Rezko, born in Aleppo Syria, and a real estate developer in Chicago. Rezko has been convicted of fraud and bribery this year. Rezko, was named "Entrepreneur of the Decade" by the Arab-American Business and Professional Association". About two years later, Obama entered Harvard Law School. Do you have any idea what tuition is for Harvard Law School? Where did he get the money for Law School? More student loans? After Law school, he went back to Chicago. Rezko offered him a job, which he turned down. But, he did take a job with Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland. Guess what? They represented "Rezar" which is Rezko's firm. Rezko was one of Obama's first major financial contributors when he ran for office in Chicago. In 2003, Rezko threw an early fundraiser for Obama which Chicago Tribune reporter David Mendelland claims was instrumental in providing Obama with "seed money" for his U.S. Senate race. In 2005, Obama purchased a new home in Kenwoood District of Chicago for $1.65 million (less than asking price). With ALL those Student Loans - Where did he get the money for the property? On the same day Rezko's wife, Rita, purchased the adjoining empty lot for full price. The London Times reported that Nadhmi Auchi, an Iraqi-born Billionaire, loaned Rezko $3.5 million three weeks before Obama's new home was purchased. Obama met Nadhmi Auchi many times with Rezko.Now, we have Obama running for President. Valerie Jarrett, was Michele Obama's boss. She is now Obama's chief advisor and he does not make any major decisions without talking to her first. Where was Jarrett born? Ready for this? Shiraz, Iran! Do we see a pattern here? Or am I going crazy?On May 10, 2008 The Times reported, Robert Malley, advisor to Obama, was "sacked" after the press found out he was having regular contacts with "Hamas", which controls Gaza and is connected with Iran. This past week, buried in the back part of the papers, Iraqi newspapers reported that during Obama's visit to Iraq, he asked their leaders to do nothing about the war until after he is elected, and he will "Take care of things"!Oh, and by the way, remember the college roommates that were born in Pakistan? They are in charge of all those "small" Internet campaign contribution for Obama. Where is that money coming from? The poor and middle class in this country? Or could it be from the Middle East? And the final bit of news. On September 7, 2008, The Washington Times posted a verbal slip that was made on "This Week" with George Stephanapoulos. Obama on talking about his religion said, "My Muslim faith". When questioned, "I made a mistake." Some mistake!All of the above information I got on line. If you would like to check it - Wikipedia, encyclopedia, Barack Obama; Tony Rezko; Valerie Jarrett: Daily Times - Obama visited Pakistan in 1981; The Washington Times - September 7, 2008; The Times May 10, 2008.Now the BIG question - If I found out all this information on my own, Why haven't all of our "intelligent" members of the press been reporting this?A phrase that keeps ringing in my ear - "Beware of the enemy from within"!!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

TIME TO RECONSIDER YOUR VOTE

With the Senate passing this so called "bailout" with all the artificial "sweeteners" it is time for voters to reconsider who they will be voting for. From  the original three pages  that it started with to  the now over four-hundred pages, this bill will be loaded with PORK! Now did you read what I just said? "Sweeteners" new code name for "Pork". They can call it whatever they want  it will still be pork.
 
The "piggies" in Washington just love "porking" the American people and the American people just keep grabbing their ankles and taking it. When are we going to say, ENOUGH, YA BASTA! And if you think the so called "OVER SIGHT"  comittees are going to  be looking out for you ,then I want to talk to you about a couple of  really awesome bridges I would love to sell you.
 
It is time to take back America and find a few good men and women to replace what we have in Washington!
 
Change you can believe in? Yep, I can believe that, especially when the only change I will see and feel will be the change in my pocket.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Congress Should Stay Home

Our 10%, DO NOTHING CONGRESS, headed by The Can't Get Anything Done Pelosi, Reed, Frank and Dodd should just stay home!
Last weekend the sky was falling and the end of the world was upon us if The Socialist's Bailout Plan was not passed.
Well unless you were Rip Van Winkle and have been asleep for the last 20 years, you missed it.
 
The sky did not fall, the sun came up this morning and Americans let their voices be heard. The courage of some politicians won and the cowardice of others lost.  The stock market took a beating the first day losing 777 points while our DO NOTHING CONGRESS was in session and today when the DO NOTHING CONGRESS was away the market went up! Imagine that. Now if this does not send a clear message I do not know what will. Let  Free Enterprise work! And let this Congress do what it does best...NOTHING!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

VIDEO THAT THE DEMOCRATS DO NOT WANT YOU TO SEE

The Democrats are quick to point the finger at George Bush  and the Republicans for the economic crisis we are currently going through. Yet they fail to point the finger at themselves. Take the time to watch and listen to the following video and then ask yourself if the garbage the Democrats are spitting out has all the smells of an unflushed toilet!
 
 
 
 
Let's take America back!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BAILOUT OR BUY-IN?

You can call a pig a dog but it is still a pig. You can call the bailout a buy-in but it is still a bailout.
Nancy Pelosi wants us to call this rescue package a "Buy-in" but no matter what you name it it is still a BAILOUT plain an simple.
 
Politicians from both ends of the spectrum want to use OUR money to bailout the corporate and political greed that has existed on Wallstreet and Washington  for years and make us believe that they are doing us a favor.
It is sickening to hear these people from the President on down tell us that this is the best thing for America.
 
You can call Socialism a "Buy-in" it is still Socialism.
 
I say we revolt and take our country back by throwing these idiots out of government and take back America and make it a government of the people and for the people. Let's call these self serving politicians by their true name. Socialists!
 
I don't know about the rest of America but I work hard for my money and do not want my money going to bailout a corrupt and greedy Wallstreet simply because politicians were asleep at the wheel . And for them to tell me that they will make sure that we get paid back is like a drug addict telling me he does not use drugs while he still has the needle in his arm.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

LETTER TO MY ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES

Dear Friends and Family:
 
I am so upset with what Congress is trying to do to us by bailing out Wall Street at our expense. As you well know this so called "bail out" will be loaded with PORK and Americans will get screwed as usual.
You also know that greed will continue and politicians, lobbyists and Wall Street executives will add to their own pockets.
 
I wrote the following to Congressman Lamar Smith, Senators Kay Bailey Hutchinson and John Cornyn:
 
My letter to you will be very simple:
I oppose the so called Bailout Plan for Wall Street totally. I am angry that you would use our money to bailout these irresponsible companies, CEO's and politicians who have allowed this to happen to us.
YOUR VOTE WILL DETERMINE MY VOTE in November and in the future.
 
I urge each of you to contact your representatives and voice your opinion. Remember, they work for us not the other way around. Let our voices be heard!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

DOING WHAT IS RIGHT

The last time I checked George W. Bush was the President of the United States and John McCain and Barrack Obama were U.S. Senators elected to represent the people of their states.

The fact that they are running for President does not make either of them President yet. Therefore John McCain is right in choosing to do the job he was elected to do and put the interest of the people over his own ambitions. Barrack Obama on the other hand continues to show his true colors by putting himself first over the interest of the people who elected him. Sadly the people of Illinois have been short changed.

The debates can wait and the American people deserve to have all members of Congress working on this economic disaster that has been caused by politicians who have taken their eyes off the ball.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA: DANCING WITH THE DEVIL

 

Barrack Obama scares the hell out of me and this has nothing to do with race in any way, shape or form! He scares me because I honestly believe that he has sold his soul to the devil in order to achieve his goals.  The more I look into his past and the more I see and observe his present behavior, the more it convinces me of this.

In the beginning,  I too, like many others was taken in with his charm, his articulate rhetoric and his beautiful family. For a moment I thought he was the real deal. That this was the man who could actually make a difference for America and the change he spoke about would actually bring about the change we all would like to see in our government. I saw a refreshing face, an outsider, a new type of politician.

I then thought to myself that I should look into this “wonderful” man with all the refreshing new ideas and burst of “positive” energy because while the “main stream” media was building him up, the other side was tearing him down. But then I was faced with the dilemma of where I was going to find information that I could rely on and make an informed decision.

Being an amateur genealogist I started looking into Barrack Obama by applying the same principles you would when looking into your own family history. You start with what you know and work backwards. I knew that he was a Senator from Illinois and prior to that he was a State Senator and Community Organizer from the Southside of Chicago, all admirable positions. What I did not know was who the people were that had some of the greatest influences in his life.

The one name that caught my attention more than anyone else was Saul Alinsky. I knew that Mr. Alinsky was an extreme radical and agitator but what I did not know was how much of an influence his writings had on Mr. Obama. I had never read any of Mr. Alinsky’s books until his name kept being brought up over and over again in reference to Obama. I then decided to read Alinsky’s book and the first one I read was an eye opener. It was the Rules for Radicals, (A Primer for Realistic Radicals). A book dedicated to Lucifer, “the very first radical…”

Alinsky, who is a confirmed atheist, believed that the here and now is all there is, and on the last page of a 1972 Playboy Interview with Saul D. Alinsky, he said the following:

ALINSKY: Sometimes it seems to me that the question people should ask is not "Is there life after death?" but "Is there life after birth?" I don't know whether there's anything after this or not. I haven't seen the evidence one way or the other and I don't think anybody else has either. But I do know that man's obsession with the question comes out of his stubborn refusal to face up to his own mortality. Let's say that if there is an afterlife, and I have anything to say about it, I will unreservedly choose to go to hell.

PLAYBOY: Why?

ALINSKY: Hell would be heaven for me. All my life I've been with the have-nots. Over here, if you're a have-not, you're short of dough. If you're a have-not in hell, you're short of virtue. Once I get into hell, I'll start organizing the have-nots over there.

PLAYBOY: Why them?

ALINSKY: They're my kind of people.

This to me was eye-opening and revealing especially as I continued to follow Barrack and Michele’s speeches and political philosophies. One such instance was during the Democratic National Convention, Michele Obama was speaking and about six and a half minutes into her speech she said the following: “…and Barrack stood up that day and he spoke words that have stayed with me ever since. He talked about the world as it is and the world as it should be….”  This came right out of Alinsky’s book, Here's an excerpt from Chapter 2, Rules for Radicals:

"The means-and-ends moralists, constantly obsessed with the ethics of the means used by the Have-Nots against the Haves, should search themselves as to their real political position. In fact, they are passive -- but real -- allies of the Haves...The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means... The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be."

This was the beginning of my turning point in thinking that Obama was a new and refreshing change in the politics as usual. Then came his trip to Europe, his acceptance speech at Invesco Field, the make believe Presidential Seal on the podiums he spoke from and all the pretentious back drops surrounding all of his appearances. The “main stream” media did not help by stroking his ego and making him feel that he was a messiah. So as I continued to search the teachings of Alinsky I saw this passage in Rules for Radicals: "The ego of the organizer is stronger and more monumental than the ego of the leader. The organizer is in a true sense reaching for the highest level for which a man can reach -- to create, to be a 'great creator', to play God." 

True to form it seemed that Mr. Obama was taking the teachings of his master to heart. In fact this led to Saul Alinsky’s son to write in a little publicized letter to the Boston Globe where he stated the following:

"Barack Obama's training in Chicago by the great community organizers is showing its effectiveness," the author continued. "When executed meticulously and thoughtfully, it is a powerful strategy for initiating change and making it really happen. Obama learned his lesson well.

"I am proud to see that my father's model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community organizing to affect the Democratic campaign in 2008," the author said. "It is a fine tribute to Saul Alinsky as we approach his 100th birthday."

The person who signed the letter, Lee David Alinsky, is indeed the son of the late radical.

Now, even though Barrack Obama has refused to publicly acknowledge the teachings of Alinsky in public he has stated that the community organizing he did in Chicago was "the best education I ever had, better than anything I got at Harvard Law School."

As I continue reading more of Alinsky’s books the more I see his philosophies being applied by Senator Obama and the more I am convinced that he has sold his soul to the Devil , since one of the Devil’s best disciple, Saul Alinsky,  is his teacher and  has taught him well.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BE PATRIOTIC PAY MORE TAXES

This is what Joe Biden wants us to do. He wants us to bail out the American economy by paying more taxes. He has basically suggested that it would be the patriotic thing to do.

Either this guy is a complete idiot or he must think that Americans are. For us to cough up more of our hard earned money and give to the thieves in Washington the opportunity to misappropriate and to enrich themselves would be like giving a drug addict access to your bank account.

Look at the mess with Freddie and Fannie, gee, who do you think has benefited from this garbage? Just read the list of who has received the most money from these two government backed institutions and guess whose team they are on in the presidential race. Gee, and guess who has received the most money from them......I will give you three guesses and the first two will not count. And he wants to change business as usual......this is laughable.

The more I discover about this man that wants to become president and the more I see the "Run for The Hills" congress, the more I hope that America will wake up and smell the coffee and defeat Obama/Biden and kick those "do nothing" thieves out of Washington.

Barack Obama #2 on Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac’s Lobbyist/Campaign Contribution List from 1989-2008

I pray that America discovers their back bone so that we can take back our country and our
core values.

Pray for our country and may God open your eyes to evil that we face!
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

VOTE FOR OBAMA BECAUSE HE IS BLACK

 

Should we be voting for Barrack Obama because he is black? According to Joe Biden we should. While campaigning in North Carolina he made the following statement and picked up by the Associated Press.

CHARLOTTE – Democratic vice presidential candidate Joe Biden, campaigning in North Carolina where black votes could help swing the state to the Democrats, said today that electing a black person to the White House would be transformative.
Biden said the policies of running mate Barack Obama make his presidency even more urgent and declared this to be the most important election that any living person has seen in their lifetime. But he particularly singled out the meaning of electing someone who is black.
"That will be a transformative event in American politics and internationally," Biden said. "That all by itself will be significant...."

Granted, that electing Obama would be transformative but is this a good enough reason to elect him, because he is black? Or should he be elected because he is the best choice to lead America forward. It is amazing how Biden and Obama always make this about race. Who here is playing the race card?

I prefer on voting for a person not because of their color, race or creed but because he or she is the best qualified to lead and make this country better than we are. Time after time Americans have risen to the occasion to make this the greatest country on earth.

I am for the person who will give us less government, less taxes and less regulation and protect the lives of the innocent.

That is my opinion, what is yours?
 
God Bless You and God Bless America!
 
KD
 
www.kendmaes.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

TABLOID JOURNALISM

 

Once upon a time long, long ago before the advent of the internet there was a man know as “the most trusted man in America.”  He was trusted because he brought into our homes a truly “fair and balanced” analysis of what was happening in the world.

It was long after he left the stage that people found out that he actually leaned to the left. Yet his journalistic professionalism was above his own political views.

That man was none other than Walter Cronkite.

Fast forward  and what is it that we find in today’s media? It is hardly objective, in fact you can compare the main stream media, cable news media and the main stream print media to the trashy tabloids that you find at the checkout stands in grocery stores, convenience stores and drug stores.

One only has to look as to what is happening in today’s political atmosphere, as recently as the Charlie Gibson interviews with Sarah Palin. What a double standard the news media has when it comes to anyone whose views do not align with theirs. Want some proof, click on to the link below where an ex-Clinton aide claims that the media is tougher on Palin. You will find this article a very interesting read.

 http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/11/politics/politicalplayers/main4442492.shtml.

Then we have Peter Jennings back in 2004 treating Mrs. John Edwards with kid gloves. Here is an excerpt of his remarks: "So much is being made all the time about how real you are...And how refreshing it is to have a mother of young children out there in a very public way." Now contrast that with how Palin is being treated and how she is being damned for accepting the Vice Presidential nomination in view of the fact that she has children at home and one with special needs.

It is so bad and so obvious that we have UPI attacking ABC of bias! See Warner Todd Huston’s article below:

UPI Charges ABC With Biased 'Double Standard' in Palin Interview

By Warner Todd Huston | September 13, 2008 - 08:46

Dontcha ya hate it when Old Media outlets beat up on other Old Media outlets? (Well, maybe you don't hate it, exactly) It's like Old Media on Old Media violence. In this case we have the United Press International (UPI), struggling lesser known news wire service, giving the big smack-a-roo to ABC. UPI is warning that Charlie Gibson's gruff handling of Governor Sarah Palin may "backfire," and that the interview revealed a "double standard" of harsh treatment for Republicans compared to the softballs they've thrown to Democrats in past interviews.

Who can disagree with that assessment?

UPI's Martin Sieff's one sentence assessment of the interview seems to be the general consensus of all dispassionate observers. "There were no surprises, no knockout zingers," Sieff says, "but also no bloopers Thursday night in Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's first TV interview since becoming the Republican vice presidential nominee."

Click on this link, http://newsbusters.org/blogs/rich-noyes/2008/09/12/2007-interview-abc-s-gibson-greeted-obama-softballs and compare his interview with Obama and the interview with Palin. Now answer this question: Who do you think the media is in the tank for?

The saddest part of all this is that a lot of the American public relies on the main-stream media to help make up their minds unfortunately the media is no longer “fair and balanced”.  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive